Re: [Samba] Fw: Btrfs Samba and Quotas
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 20:15:04 +0100
- From: Rowland penny via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Samba] Fw: Btrfs Samba and Quotas
On 20/05/2019 19:47, Hendrik Friedel wrote:
What I was trying to say was (and failing, it would seem), this is a two
way street and if OMV cannot/will not help you, then it is hard to fix,
especially now that Jeremy has pointed out that it cannot be fixed as
is. Now this doesn't mean it can never be fixed, throw enough money and
man hours at it and a workaround can probably be found, but this would
undoubtedly entail OMV getting involved .
What do you mean? [there was a 'shows' missing. It shoult have read
'shows that there is good reas on to']
You posted this:
I am using Openmediavault (debian based NAS distribution), which is
not actively supporting btrfs
It is this that I was referring to.
OMV intended to move to btrfs as the only choice with the next
version. In order to pave the way, I intended to be an early
adopter. The problem I report here, that there is good reason to.
For you perhaps, but if OMV will not help, well......
That sort of says a lot, if it was that big a problem and multiple
users were complaining, then it probably would get fixed, but there
are only so many developers and they have only so much time available
to fix things and add new features, so the most important things get
fixed first. We do, however, accept patches to fix things, so perhaps
you can get together with OMV and fix it from your end ;-)
I fear, that's beyond my skills.
Well, I did my best.
At least I hope you can understand why some bug reports seem to take
forever to get fixed, it is all down to priorities, the highest
priority ones get fixed first, unless one annoys a user enough that they
put their hand in their pocket and they pay someone to get it fixed.
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the