Re: [Samba] compile samba 4.10.2 centos 7.6
- Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 15:48:05 -0400 (EDT)
- From: "Vincent S. Cojot via samba" <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Samba] compile samba 4.10.2 centos 7.6
Hi Sergio & List,
On Sun, 14 Apr 2019, Sérgio Basto via samba wrote:
On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 07:43 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 7:20 AM Andreas Habel via samba
I managed to compile 4.10.0 under CentOS 7.6. I did the following:
I'll put muney down that you did not get it working as a full domain
controller. The"--with-dc" option activates a gnutls >= 3.4.7
At least for samba 4.8.x, you only need gnutls >= 3.4.7 if you use MIT
kbr, old kbr don't need it .
Seems the same holds true for samba-4.9.x (and maybe for 4.10.x as well).
It compiled on RHEL7.6 with gnutls-3.3.29 with a SPEC file
partially based on TranquilIT's & Fedora + a few changes (mostly around
python2 vs python3 stuff)
[root@dc02 ~]# rpm -q gnutls
[root@dc02 ~]# python -V
[root@dc02 ~]# /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-4.9.6/bin/smbd -b|grep -i dc
[root@dc02 ~]# /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-4.10.2/bin/smbd -b|grep -i dc
Also, please note my DCs are running SELinux in permissive mode, not in
disabled mode and I have not had an issue with that.
We could get together and discuss this as we seems to all have different
answers regarding the supportability of samba 4.10 on rhel7 clones. I am
not experiencing the issues you are observing (and neither is TranquilIT,
who seems to be supporting very similar builds on rhel7). I would doubt
that the differences between rhel7 and centos7 are sufficient to cause
this behaviour but I am willing to investigate (a little).
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the