Re: [Samba] selftest
- Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 17:58:54 +0100
- From: Rowland Penny via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Samba] selftest
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 15:48:41 +0000 (UTC)
Billy Bob <billysbobs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 21:49:06 +0000 (UTC)
> > Billy Bob via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > While 'make test' is intended to> pass generally, the reference
> > > > environment is Ubuntu 14.04 (soon to be> upgraded to 18.04 for
> > > > the next release).
> > >
> > > By "next release," do you mean 4.10.1 or 4.11?
> > >
> > > Looking also at
> > > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2019-April/222157.html is
> > > there concern that 4.10.0 is not production-ready on Ubuntu 18.04?
> > >
> > No, I just wasn't building Samba into the default prefix
> > '/usr/local/samba', so I had to backport various Samba packages from
> > 18.10 before it would build. I have no doubt that if I had run
> > './configure && make && sudo make install', it would have worked.
> > The point of the post you referred to, was that RHEL 7.x probably
> > isn't production ready for 4.10.0
> Three things:
> 1) would you share your build notes with me (v. 4.10.0 on Ubuntu
Yes, but there isn't much point now, Louis has released his Ubuntu
packages and these will replace any ubuntu packages already installed.
>2) do you have any insight re: the version expected to have
> the 'make test' fix (earlier question above directed to Andrew)?
No, this is more in Andrews field of expertise than mine, but I don't
really understand why you require this. It is really meant to ensure
that the developers don't break things, it isn't required to run Samba
> can you provide any insights on pros/cons of configuring as default
> vs. configuring with fhs when building on Ubuntu 18.04? I note (a)
> with respect to default, your comment regarding Ubuntu still
> expecting some distro packages and (b) that you and Louis both seem
> to configure fhs. On the other hand, it seems that there is more to
> the fhs configuration, e.g. the "backport" requirements. Would
> appreciate some more in-depth discussion of these
> particular considerations and concomitant issues (either here or in a
> further/follow up to you previous answer to
> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2019-April/222172.html ;). Thank
> you, as always
I only built Samba 4.10.0 using the FHS because it seemed it was a
problem, I normally just build Samba into /usr/local/samba but I don't
build it much nowadays, I use Louis's packages ;-)
As for an 'fhs' build, this may just work, but if you have an earlier
Samba version installed before the build, then watch out for updates.
If you build into /usr/local/samba then various things do not work as
As for backporting packages from Disco, it isn't quite straight
forward, 18.04 comes with python3.6 and 18.10 comes with python3.7,
so a few files have to be modified.
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the