Re: [Samba] 32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 19:10:12 +0530
- From: Saurabh Nanda via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Samba] 32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
> (Also, the client ends up consuming all 1Gbps of network bandwidth).
> This statement is grossly incorrect. The client is not consuming 1Gbps,
> but 1MBps -- I'm confused between bits per second and bytes per second, it
> I am replicating the scenario with NFS to see if it's an issue with Samba,
> or something to do with the underlying network stack.
Here's NFS vs Samba:
## Samba - Uses about 1MBps throughout
## NFS - Uses about 1.5-2.0 MBps throughout
I now have no clue what is going on. Are the **number** of files and
directories so large that this is kind-of expected?
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the