Re: [Samba] Linux multiple member server
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 09:36:59 -0500
- From: Robert Wooden via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Samba] Linux multiple member server
So, one question at a time.
Best practice would be for all the member servers to be the same "ad" or
Second question. (You mentioned new to old.)
If moving data files *from* old ("ad") member server to new ("rid") member
server with ranges as you suggested would correct my strange ranges?
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 7:15 AM, Rowland Penny via samba <
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 06:31:46 -0500
> Robert Wooden <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Rowland,
> > Sorry, now I am really confused . . . I thought users were suppose to
> > maintain the same ranges on all the member servers?
> Sorry, it wasn't my intention to confuse you ;-)
> Lets start with, never change the ranges on an existing Unix domain
> member, unless you are just raising the upper number in the 'Domain'
> range e.g.
> idmap config SAMDOM : range = 10000-40000
> idmap config SAMDOM : range = 10000-50000
> If you use the 'ad' backend, then you MUST use the same 'idmap config'
> block on all Unix domain members.
> If you use the 'rid' backend, then the numeric ID's are local and can
> be different on each Unix domain member. You must remember that the
> 'rid' backend calculates user & group ID's from the Windows RID and
> every 'ID' will be unique
> If you set up a new 'rid' based Unix domain member, you can use the
> 'idmap config' I suggested and you will be able to copy files from
> this domain member to one of your older domain members and the
> ownership will remain the same.
> I hope this clears up the confusing, if not, just ask.
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the