Web lists-archives.com

Re: [Samba] "missing security tab" and related ACL issues




On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 11:22:36 +0200
"Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> At a customer server (gentoo linux, so far only Samba version 4.7.7)
> we tried to use Windows ACLs and failed:
> 
> no security tab in Windows ... for local C: yes, not on samba shares
> 
> Yes, I followed
> 
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs
> 
> and have the vfs module enabled etc
> 
> -
> 
> Now I consider that the kernel doesn't have the necessary flags set.
> 
> I get
> 
> # getfattr -n security.NTACL -d  /mnt/MSA2040/smb/IT
> /mnt/MSA2040/smb/IT: security.NTACL: Operation not supported
> 
> but
> 
> # getfacl /mnt/MSA2040/smb/IT
> getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names
> # file: mnt/MSA2040/smb/IT
> # owner: ittner
> # group: dom�nen-benutzer
> user::rwx
> group::rwx
> other::r-x
> 
> -
> 
>  From the old kernel config I see these flags unset:
> 
> # CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL is not set
> # CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY is not set
> 
> So I prepared a new kernel with these 2 flags enabled and will reboot
> at 2:30pm ... We'll see!
> 
> Any other issues I might miss here?
> 
> 

Apart from the fact getattr works on an EA and getfacl works on
extended ACL's i.e. different things ? ;-)

Stop me if I am wrong, but isn't 'benutzer' German for 'users' ?
What is the the German for 'admins' ?

Rowland

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba