Re: [Samba] multiple passdb backends for standalone fileserver?
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 09:51:31 +0200
- From: Matthias Leopold via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Samba] multiple passdb backends for standalone fileserver?
Am 2018-08-20 um 17:15 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:43:24 +0200
Matthias Leopold via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
i (naively) would like to have local AND ldap users (and groups...)
on my standalone fileserver (security = user). "passdb backend =
ldapsam" already works OK and i found some old posts on the internet
about "chaining" passdb backends. so i tried "chaining" ldapsam and
tdbsam, but although testparm doesn't complain and i can add local
users with "pdbedit -b tdbsam" this setup doesn't actually work (ldap
users are found, local are not)
is this supposed to work? are there other ways to achieve this?
samba version: 4.7.1 (on CentOS)
By its very definition, a standalone server is just that, so ALL its
users are LOCAL. You need users in Samba to match the local Unix users,
whether you use tdbsam or ldapsam is up to you, but you cannot use
Why do you want to do what you are trying to do ?
What do you want to achieve ?
thanks for your explanation, you're right of course and i already
suspected there wouldn't be a way, because it actually doesn't make much
sense. in my case it was only a question of convenience, because the
ldap server used isn't designed for a samba backend and servers mainly
other purposes (although ldapsam does work). it's rather costly to get
users in there, but i'll go this way
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the