Re: [Samba] Erro Transfer Fsmo(DNS)
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 11:44:47 -0700
- From: Luke Barone via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Samba] Erro Transfer Fsmo(DNS)
So in theory, you should be able to seize the roles onto the server that
you expected would have the role, right?
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Carlos via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> In wiki -> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Transferring_and_Seizing_FS
> "If the DC is broken (e. g. hardware defect) and will never come back
> again, then you can seize the role on a remaining DC. It is very important
> that the old DC will never be connected to the network again, if it is
> connected again, this will cause conflicts and lead to an inconsistent AD.
> This is because the old DC will not notice the change and still feel
> responsible for tasks related to the role."
> In my case, the problem is not hardware, but maintenance, but both servers
> will be connected ....
> On 06-06-2018 14:58, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>> On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 14:45:03 -0300
>> Carlos via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> But, if you use the "seizi" dc that no longer has the FSMO should be
>>> removed from the network, right?
>>> No, what ever gave you that idea ?
>> It is true that seizing is mostly used when a DC has died and you
>> should use 'transfer' where possible, but, as in your case, you can use
>> 'seize' if needed and keep the DC you are seizing from.
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the