Re: [Samba] ACL set in Windows not set in Samba
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 21:17:50 +0200
- From: Viktor Trojanovic via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Samba] ACL set in Windows not set in Samba
Thanks for replying again.
On 13 May 2018 at 18:12, Rowland Penny via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> On Sun, 13 May 2018 17:39:39 +0200
> Viktor Trojanovic via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > username map = /etc/samba/samba_usermap
> What is in the 'samba_usermap' ?
!root = SAMDOM\Administrator SAMDOM\administrator
> > [myshare]
> > path = /srv/samba/myshare
> > comment = "My Data"
> > guest ok = no
> > writeable = yes
> > create mask = 0666
> > directory mask = 0777
> > acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes
> As you are trying to use Windows ACLs, you should follow the info on
> the page you linked and stop getting creative ;-)
Trust me, I have no intention of getting creative. This is how I set up the
share a year or two ago and haven't changed it in the meantime. It used to
work. Now all of a sudden something doesn't.
> Remove the 'guest ok' line, it is the default.
> Remove the two 'mask' lines, the last line is actually telling Samba
> to ignore them.
Yes, I read that, but didn't hurry to remove them as they shouldn't hurt.
Will do so now, though.
> > Slightly off topic: Is my assumption correct that gidNumbers and
> > uidNumbers do not need to be distinct between each other, i.e. can a
> > user have the same number as uidNumber that a group has as gidNumber?
> Yes, whilst every user must have a unique uidNumber and every group
> must have a unique gidNumber, there is nothing stopping a user and a
> group having the same number.
That's what I thought, thanks.
Not knowing what else to try, I'll just go ahead and restart everything and
see if this has any impact.
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the