Web lists-archives.com

Re: [Samba] broken mailing-list -> Re: Accentuated characters issue when receiving attributes from "samba user syncpasswords"

Am 28.03.2018 um 18:47 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:22:16 +0200
> Reindl Harald via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Am 28.03.2018 um 18:07 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
>>> On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:32:33 +0200
>>> Reindl Harald via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Am 28.03.2018 um 17:21 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
>>>>> On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:59:19 +0200
>>>>> Reindl Harald via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> Am 28.03.2018 um 16:50 schrieb Lapin Blanc:
>>>>>>> Thank you for the tip, i'll use it, but how come it's correctly
>>>>>>> encoded in the DN and not in the attribute ?
>>>>>>> Is it related to the ldif format or something ?
>>>>>> no idea and hence *do not* reply privately on mailing-lists
>>>>>> i just recognize base64 when i see it
>>>>>> proper mail clients respect
>>>>>> List-Post: <mailto:samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> whoever configured that mailing list to add a wrong reply-to
>>>>>> header should be punsihed because my mails for sure contain one
>>>>>> and it's pervert to break a list like that
>>>>>> Reply-To: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> It isn't the mailing list, it is probably the OP's mail client
>>>> it *is* the mailing list, the OP's mail client is not part of the
>>>> game of my own posts received from the list and when you look
>>>> *every* single mail from the samba ML and *noly* from the samba ML
>>>> has this stupid "Reply-To" header
>>>> your message i reply to (luckily because thunderbird understand
>>>> list-headers and ignores Reply-To with the "Reply-List"-button)
>>>> From: Rowland Penny via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Reply-To: Rowland Penny <rpenny@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Errors-To: samba-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Sender: samba <samba-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> OK, I see what you mean, but 'Mailman' is set up to NOT remove
>>> 'Reply-To' headers, this is what 'Mailman' recommends, so I don't
>>> see it changing
>> WTF - nobody asked for remove it - i ask for not invite it because it
>> *adds one* even when there was none - to every single message coming
>> from this list
>> don't stop prematurely read messages, i gave you an example where you
>> can see my sent-message from my local client as well as the reply-to
>> header in the middle of headers populated by the list server
>> just go into your local list-folder nad look: *every* single message
>> of this list has a reply-to header pointing to the posters address
>> and since this is only on *this* mlaing list while others which don't
>> do that also use mailman what is the point of your discussion?
> When it comes to 'Reply-To', 'mailman' is set to 'Poster'
> From Mailman help:
> This option controls what Mailman does to the Reply-To: header in
> messages flowing through this mailing list. When set to Poster, no
> Reply-To: header is added by Mailman, although if one is present in the
> original message, it is not stripped. 
> In the full headers of the post you referred to, there is this:
> Reply-To: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

in the list message, yes, and that's the whole point of my "broken

> Mailman isn't adding it and you say you are not adding it, so where is
> it coming from ??
from somewhere on the samba-maling list - period
how can you prove that Mailmain don't add it?

i can prove it's not there in the sent message and our postfix for sure
don't add headers (i am the mailadmin of some hundret maildomains and
would know that)

i can also prove that "Reply-To: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
only exists in mails from the samba-list, not on any other mailing-list
and when i press "reply" on such a mail it becomes a off-list message
which is terrible

To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba