Re: [Samba] Is it possible to lower the domain and forest functional level
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:37:54 +0100 (CET)
- From: Christophe Borivant via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Samba] Is it possible to lower the domain and forest functional level
Thanks to your input, I've been able to run the samba_upgradeprovision script.
But the full oprion fails with :
Creating a reference provision
WARNING: no network interfaces found
No IPv4 address will be assigned
WARNING: no network interfaces found
No IPv6 address will be assigned
Update base samdb by searching difference with reference one
Starting update of samdb
There are 125 missing objects
Reloading a merged schema, which might trigger reindexing so please be patient
Unable to convert 220.127.116.11.18.104.22.168.22.214.171.124 to an attid, and can_change_pfm=false!
../source4/dsdb/schema/schema_init.c:669: 'followReferrals': unable to map attributeID 126.96.36.199.188.8.131.52.184.108.40.206: WERR_NOT_FOUND
Exception during upgrade of samdb:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./source4/scripting/bin/samba_upgradeprovision", line 1150, in update_partition
File "./source4/scripting/bin/samba_upgradeprovision", line 1073, in reload_full_schema
dsdb._dsdb_set_schema_from_ldif(samdb, prefixmap_ldif, schema_ldif, schemadn)
WERRORError: (1168, 'WERR_NOT_FOUND')
Rolling back all changes. Check the cause of the problem
Your system is as it was before the upgrade
This attribute comes from an extension for HP-UX (ldapux) which allows me to identify my HPUX users.
I also have other attributes coming from the deprecated MSFU3.5 but We don't use those attributes anymore.
Do you think the samba_upgradeprovision without --full option would be enough ? I don't really uderstand the difference between with and without this option.
Responsable d'exploitation informatique
+33 5 62 20 71 71 (Poste 503)
Devinlec - Groupe Leclerc
----- Mail original -----
De: "Andrew Bartlett" <abartlet@xxxxxxxxx>
À: "Christophe BORIVANT" <cborivant@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "samba" <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Envoyé: Lundi 19 Février 2018 19:52:09
Objet: Re: [Samba] Is it possible to lower the domain and forest functional level
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 19:07 +0100, Christophe Borivant wrote:
> I made a try translating the group names one by one in the setup/provision_users.ldif file.
> The first groups went OK but when I translate "Incoming Forest Trust Builders" by "Générateurs d'approbations de forêt entrante",
> I get this error from the script :
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "source4/scripting/bin/samba_upgradeprovision", line 1714, in <module>
> schema, schemareloadclosure):
> File "source4/scripting/bin/samba_upgradeprovision", line 1360, in update_samdb
> schema, provisionUSNs, prereloadfunc)
> File "source4/scripting/bin/samba_upgradeprovision", line 1145, in update_partition
> add_missing_entries(ref_samdb, samdb, names, basedn, listMissing)
> File "source4/scripting/bin/samba_upgradeprovision", line 757, in add_missing_entries
> hashMissing, index)
> File "source4/scripting/bin/samba_upgradeprovision", line 616, in add_missing_object
> _ldb.LdbError: (1, 'Unable to parse search expression')
> Could the "ê" be a problem or the length of the string ?
The issue is that this script was never tested with non-ascii names.
Each instance of
"(distinguishedName=%s) % user_dn
in the script needs to be updated to be:
"(distinguishedName=%s)" % ldb.binary_encode(user_dn)
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the