Web lists-archives.com

Re: [Samba] Linux vs. Windows SMB buffering

On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 06:09:32PM +0000, Will Lucas via samba wrote:
> Hi all,
> In our office we use a program that makes many small writes to a file. We
> have been trying to use this program with our NAS, which hosts a Samba
> share on the network. However, the performance of the program is
> staggeringly slow on Window 7, 8.1, and 10.
> To make the problem easily repeatable, I created a small C++ program to
> just write 1 million lines to a file:
> https://github.com/mevatron/nas-write-test
> Next, I performed a packet capture of the two OS conversations with
> Wireshark. I found the Linux SMB implementation buffer many hundreds of
> lines into each write; whereas, Windows decides to immediately flush it's
> buffer to disk on each line write, which obviously causes tremendous
> protocol overhead and thus abysmal performance.
> I was hoping someone with more knowledge of SMB has seen this before or has
> deeper insights into what I can do to solve it.
> I have a more visual write up of all of this on ServerFault here:
> https://serverfault.com/questions/808633/small-writes-to-smb-network-share-are-slow-on-windows-fast-over-cifs-linux-moun

Does the wireshark trace show the Windows client asking for and
getting a RWH lease under SMB2 ? If so, then there's no reason
it can't be caching the entire file locally. Seems strange
behaviour from the Windows redirector here.

To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba