Re: [Samba] Problem with Samba 4.5.8 as a macOS server
- Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 19:24:36 +0200
- From: Ralph Böhme via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Samba] Problem with Samba 4.5.8 as a macOS server
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 03:46:49PM +0200, Frank Heldt via samba wrote:
> Hello all,
> I’m trying to use samba 4.5.8 as a file server for my Macs (all 10.12.4 now), as a replacement for netatalk.
> I did setup smb.conf as suggested
> # Options for macOS
> # http://netatalk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Netatalk_3.1.11_SRPM_for_Fedora_and_CentOS <http://netatalk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Netatalk_3.1.11_SRPM_for_Fedora_and_CentOS>
> ea support = yes
> vfs objects = btrfs catia fruit streams_xattr
btrfs should be put to the end of the list.
> fruit:encoding = native
> streams_xattr:store_stream_type = no
> streams_xattr:prefix = user.
please be aware that the last two options are seldomly used and currently not
tested in out test-suite. They should work, but ymmv.
> # don’t use unix ext.
> unix extensions = no
10.12 Macs will use SMB3 and this option is (atm) a SMB1 thingy, so it has no effect.
> and a share
> path = /data/Transfer
> public = yes
> writable = yes
> printable = no
> create mask = 0775
> directory mask = 0775
> Switching between afp:// and smb:// on the Mac looks exactly the same (eg Tags
> are seen on both sides), the performance under Finder via smb:// for this
> share is visibly faster (lots of files there). So that’s perfect :-)
> The problem is the create/directory mask: it is totally ignored! Every
> file/folder I create via smb has no group write access, although the mask
> should give it this. Even the force modes are ignored.
Please try setting the global option
fruit:nfs_aces = no
Alternatively you can set the global umask on the clients to 0 (instead of the
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the