Web lists-archives.com

Re: [Samba] Samba 4.5.7 breaks my smb-servers on Fedora 25




Hai, 

Thanks for that extra explanation, that is known.
And good this one isnt in production yet. 

I ask because i've seen other reporteds this weekend with about the same problem and setting like this worked for them, by setting it explicit like that. 

And for others, that have there root (/ ) shared. A possible workaround.
Read : 
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11647#c7 


About the VFS object, ( and Rowland correct me if im wrong ) 
The vfs object in Global loads some defaults based on what your running.  ADDC member etc.
By adding the extra in the share, may help in a correct load order, but yes you can add them also all in the Global parameters.
I personaly preffer to leave the defaults as much as is, and add there only where needed. 

And thank you for shareing this all. 

Greetz, 

Louis



> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Namens Reindl Harald via
> samba
> Verzonden: maandag 27 maart 2017 13:08
> Aan: samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba 4.5.7 breaks my smb-servers on Fedora 25
> 
> 
> 
> Am 27.03.2017 um 12:56 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba:
> > Hai
> >
> > An other possible workaround,
> >
> >
> > You can also try to add the vfs object in the share share its needed.
> > In you global settings :
> >    allow insecure wide links = yes
> >    unix extensions = no
> >
> > in the share, there where needed.
> >
> > vfs objects = (yourneeded vfs_objects) and wide links = yes
> >
> > vfs object is normaly set in the share not global.
> > At least thats was `man smb.conf` is telling me.
> > The load order of vfs_objects do matter.
> 
> no, [G] means you can not override per share, but that don't imply [S]
> means you can not set a default for all shares and in my setups all
> shares should behave identical
> 
> luckily F25 is currentyl only testing, so no workaround at the moment
> needed - they make it only harder to verify if it's if it's fixed later
> 
> that issue will hopefully fixed soon
> 
> >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> >> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Namens Reindl Harald
> via
> >> samba
> >> Verzonden: maandag 27 maart 2017 12:26
> >> Aan: samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba 4.5.7 breaks my smb-servers on Fedora 25
> >>
> >> Am 27.03.2017 um 12:20 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> >>> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:00:22 +0200
> >>> Reindl Harald via samba <samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436145
> >>>> anyone a clue what is going on here?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I think you might be hitting a regression, see this bug report:
> >>>
> >>> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12721
> >>
> >> confirmed - that's a big price for teh fix of a unlikely symlink
> related
> >> race-condition to allow symlinks at all now :-(
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> >> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba