Web lists-archives.com

Re: [Samba] (DeviceIoControl, FSCTL_SET_SPARSE)

Hi Brian,

On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 01:20:46 -0800, brian lamb via samba wrote:

> Configured as you mention, and prior with the other tweaks I had in the first place,  Im getting the same results, which is "FSUTIL utility requires a Local NTFS Volume", and mapping it.

Hmm, this works fine for me against a Samba 4.4.2 Btrfs backed Samba

        store dos attributes = yes

        path = /tmp/tmp.UR3ZbULpHJ
        read only = no

Windows Server 2012 client:
("store dos attributes = no" configured on server)
PS> fsutil.exe sparse setflag \\samba_server\share\file
Error:  Incorrect function.

("store dos attributes = yes" configured on server)
PS> fsutil.exe sparse setflag \\samba_server\share\file
PS> fsutil.exe sparse queryflag \\samba_server\share\file
This file is set as sparse

I don't think it's worth trying to triage your application problems
any further until you have this simple test case working. Please set
"log level = 10" on the Samba server, and rerun the above test.
Attach the resulting debug log to a bugzilla.samba.org ticket.

Also, please check whether you can manually set an extended attribute
locally against a file in your share path. e.g.
samba_server:/tmp/tmp.UR3ZbULpHJ/:[0]# setfattr -n user.stuff -v xattr-data file
samba_server:/tmp/tmp.UR3ZbULpHJ/:[0]# getfattr -d file

Furthermore, could you please check whether Samba is compiled with xattr
support - i.e.:
samba_server:# smbd -b | grep -i xattr

> I then went to contig, `contig -n X:\share\sparesefile 0`, as well as a few other size.  Maybe im using it wrong, but some testing on contig has only "Access is denied" when I try to write to anything. 
> Oh one change, I put these settings only in Global (only, as opposed to also in the pool definition), I just realized.  I believe global should be enough shouldn’t it? 

[globa]l section is fine, as long as it's not also set in the share

> [global]
>     # ZFS SPARSE
>     #share:fake_fscaps = 0
>     store dos attributes = yes
>     strict allocate = yes
> I hadn’t heard any mention of the importance of strict allocate, would that setting be wise then?

It doesn't affect how FSCTL_SET_SPARE is handled.

> What are some other tools I might try that with?  I can try straight on the linux too, just as a test, if there is any tools recommended to test that with.  I will also look something up for that tomorrow as well.  

Let's get "fsutil.exe sparse setflag" working first.

Cheers, David

To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba