Re: Thoughts on Brave Browser?
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 12:02:58 -0400
- From: Big Al <BigAl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Thoughts on Brave Browser?
On 04/12/2018 11:49 AM, Big Al wrote:
On 04/12/2018 11:46 AM, John Sterling wrote:
You can use a real news reader client, line Mozilla Thunderbird, and the
setup of the news server allows you to enter a fake email.
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 11:44:57 AM UTC-4, John Sterling wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 5:49:52 PM UTC-4, WaltS48 wrote:
On 4/11/18 4:33 PM, Sailfish wrote:
My bloviated meandering follows what johnasterlingco@xxxxxxxxx
with on 4/11/2018 12:35 PM:
I'd like to know what Mozilla leaders thinks of the Brave Software
Brave Browser. It's ad block by default with using blockchain tech to
pay websites and cleanup ads is a pretty awesome idea. I have some
concerns with their ability to monopolize if they are successful. I
know that Brendan Eich was a higher up in Mozilla a few years back, I
know there could be some hard feelings... but I'm hoping to find some
good discussions about the merits of what Brave is doing and what
Mozilla is doing. I'm considering which (or both) to continue to
support (by telling friends, donations and possibly coding).
If you aren't familiar with the Brave Browser, here is a summary
with a few of my concerns:
Brave addresses the ad issue on the web:
* Content providers aren’t getting enough money, meaning we (users)
are losing content (nothing is free)
* Fraud – something like 7 billion dollars per year lost to fraud and
not paying for your content or apps
* Malware – ex. Ads doing bitcoin mining in the background
* Horribly distracting – especially auto-start video ads
* Takes time for you device to download and display ads on each page
* simplifies the ad system be removing middle players and providing
much more security
* Allows micropayments instead of advertising if users choose to
* might be setting itself up to be a monopoly – I worry about that
* Brave Software Inc is a privately held company, I don’t like the
idea of doing open source work that makes a private company money…
the cause they are supporting still seems worthwhile. I wish they
If they provided the tab functionality of TMP, then I'd switch in a
heartbeat; otherwise, I'll stick with Fx52.xESR for as long as I can.
Have you tried Vivaldi?
Best name ever! Cadet Bone Spurs
NRA = Newly Recruited Activists
National Popular Vote <http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/>
Ubuntu 16.04LTS - Unity Desktop
I took a look just now at Vivaldi, the one thing I find exciting is
that it is employee owned. I like that because my post is about
activism, not just what is the best browser.
On that note, I'm not sure you understand what I'm looking for.
The web and our society are having serious issues and Brave's
strategy for handling ads looks like a good way to mitigate a piece
There is also a huge problem with proprietary apps and apps (and
websites) that manipulate the users and get them to waste their
time. A different corporate model is needed I think for those
issues, Brave doesn't have that. Open source projects have some of
that but I think really give most of the power to the developers and
not the users. Vivladi being employee owned is interesting because
Really though - I want to hear what Mozilla thinks of the Brave
browser project - Branden used to be a leader at Mozilla and is now
doing this project, so they have to be very aware.
also - is there a way to participate in this google group without
having your email address displayed? I don't want to start getting
spam because some bot scanned a google group or email.
"You can use a real news reader client, like..."
general mailing list