Re: Safe To Stay With 56.0.2 ?
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 05:53:31 -0700
- From: Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Safe To Stay With 56.0.2 ?
My bloviated meandering follows what WaltS48 graced us with on 3/9/2018 7:27 AM:
I disagree. More precisely, users are more concerned about massive functional regression than security. Those "extensions" you seem not interested in are productive add-ons that make using the browser more useful.On 3/9/18 6:30 AM, PietB wrote:Quoting from the given article about Pale Moon:- "The older code also omits features that help make modern browsers so secure, like the multi-process sandboxing features that have finally arrived in Firefox Quantum."For how many users is that*really* important in everyday life?Precisely my point. Users are more concerned with extensions than security.
-- Sailfish Rare Mozilla Stuff: http://tinyurl.com/z86x3sg _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general