Web lists-archives.com

Re: New browser from the devs of Palemoon




Em 22-11-2017 18:21, Sailfish escreveu:
My bloviated meandering follows what Balaco graced us with on 11/22/2017
11:52 AM:
Em 22-11-2017 17:38, Sailfish escreveu:
My bloviated meandering follows what Balaco graced us with on 11/22/2017
11:19 AM:
Em 22-11-2017 17:05, Balaco escreveu:

<snip/>

I am puzzled to find a reason why omni.ja is 13MiB and this XPI file
is only 420KiB. Should I bet that both contain the same number of
strings?

Yep, throw those dtd's into the "arduous" mix, too :-)

The chrome, jssubloader and modules are the largest consumers and they
contain the actual browser code files.

Mmmm... (:

You shouldn't need to modify the code modules by replacing DTD strings
and even adding new DTD strings for Basilisk-specific additions, I would
think?


No, we should not need to modify any code. From a programmer point of view and probable organization of binary files for the Firefox program, both should be separated, and should exist separated. Looks promissing! My "mmm" with a smile was something to tell "I am thinking and liking of what you found".

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general