On 3/20/17 11:03 PM, Wolf K. wrote:
On 2017-03-20 11:47, Disaster Master wrote:
On Mon Mar 20 2017 11:02:33 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Wolf K.
On 2017-03-20 10:32, Disaster Master wrote:
Really? You don't believe that taxation - like all Law - is, in the end,
enforced at gunpoint?
Well, of course.
Then stop saying otherwise.
I haven't. I've merely done a reductio ad absurduim to show the silliness of
the reason that you keep harping on this: your argument is that since laws are
enforced "at gunpoiint" that tgherefore they are evil.
It's the only language the thugs understand.
Not sure if you mean the enforcers, or those at the receiving end of the
However, most people don't need to be forced into compliance,
<snip> the rest of the irrelevant prattle.
Ah, but it's what's most relevant. If you don't see that, you have no relevant
understanding of how humans actually behave.
BTW, why do you believe that a document framed before there were
streetcars implies that the government has no role to play in transit?
Again, that question is completely irrelevant.
There is, in fact, no delegation of power or authority over 'transit' in
Quite right, the Constitution does not refer to "transit". It also does not
refer to immigration either. Nor to borders. Or a whole host of other things,
such a railroads, highways, aviation, etc. So, to be consistent, your stance
would have to be that the Federal Government has no power or authority over
any of these things.
[snip literalist irrelevancies]
I am drinking water, at least
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49a2
Build identifier: 20161122013001
I never met a man I didn't want to fight.
-- Lyle Alzado, professional football lineman
general mailing list