On 2017-03-20 11:47, Disaster Master wrote:
On Mon Mar 20 2017 11:02:33 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Wolf K.
On 2017-03-20 10:32, Disaster Master wrote:
Really? You don't believe that taxation - like all Law - is, in the end,
enforced at gunpoint?
Well, of course.
Then stop saying otherwise.
I haven't. I've merely done a reductio ad absurduim to show the
silliness of the reason that you keep harping on this: your argument is
that since laws are enforced "at gunpoiint" that tgherefore they are evil.
It's the only language the thugs understand.
Not sure if you mean the enforcers, or those at the receiving end of the
However, most people don't need to be forced into compliance,
<snip> the rest of the irrelevant prattle.
Ah, but it's what's most relevant. If you don't see that, you have no
relevant understanding of how humans actually behave.
BTW, why do you believe that a document framed before there were
streetcars implies that the government has no role to play in transit?
Again, that question is completely irrelevant.
There is, in fact, no delegation of power or authority over 'transit' in
Quite right, the Constitution does not refer to "transit". It also does
not refer to immigration either. Nor to borders. Or a whole host of
other things, such a railroads, highways, aviation, etc. So, to be
consistent, your stance would have to be that the Federal Government has
no power or authority over any of these things.
[snip literalist irrelevancies]
"What good is it having lower taxes when you can’t drink the water?”
general mailing list