Re: Making America Polluted Again
On 3/20/2017, 12:36:16 PM, Caver1 <caver1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/20/2017 12:06 PM, Disaster Master wrote:
>> You claim that I said something I didn't as if it supports your argument
>> somehow, then when I point this out, you say it doesn't matter?
> The original statement was that Trump backed down on his
> Immigration policy.
> I said no he didn't back down he wrote a new EO to get
> around the courts.
> you came back with;
> On 03/20/2017 10:29 AM, Disaster Master wrote:
> > No, he issued a new EO to try to eliminate the points in
> > the first one that caused the problems.
> Since you answered "No, he issued..."
> The no was in relation to me saying he didn't back down.
No, *my* 'no' was obviously in relation to your claim that 'he did it to
get around the courts'.
Yet another example of why children shouldn't engage in political
discussion without parental supervision.
> IOf you want to get into a thread you need to post clearly
> what you are referring to.
Sorry, it is not my job to try to engage my crystal ball and see what
silly error in reading/comprehension you will make next time.
> You really can't back up your arguments.
That is because it is self-evident.
But, I'll agree to 'back up my argument' if you first answer a simple
What makes you think that the enforcement of laws is not ultimately at
Or asked another way, how do you think laws are supposed to be enforced?
By someone walking up to you and saying 'pretty please'?
>>> But you did say that Trump should "Then push Congress to
>>> have these kinds of powers REMOVED from potential Judicial
>> Yes I did, but that doesn't mean he can *make* them do it.
> But you plainly implied that you wanted to see the
> separation done away with.
No, you merely incorrectly inferred that from a very plainly worded
comment that could in no way be construed as such save by someone with
little to no logical reasoning capability.
general mailing list