Web lists-archives.com

Re: Making America Polluted Again




In <news:597c364f-ba8d-157f-853f-142bad0ad2a4@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Rinaldi <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> »Q« decreed, Read These Runes!:
> > In <news:mailman.363.1489696156.10544.general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > Disaster Master <disasterlistmanager@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >   
> >> On Thu Mar 16 2017 16:24:28 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time),
> >> Caver1 <caver1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
> >> > On 03/16/2017 04:01 PM, Disaster Master wrote:    
> >> >> On Thu Mar 16 2017 15:45:42 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time),
> >> >> Caver1 <caver1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:    
> >> >>> On 03/16/2017 03:13 PM, Disaster Master wrote:    
> >> >>>> Those 'civil servants' are also known as the 'deep state' -
> >> >>>> they are the ones actually in control of the government, the
> >> >>>> ones who remain regardless of who is President or in Congress.
> >> >>>>    
> >> >>> By the actual meaning of deep state it doesn't apply.
> >> >>> Trump and his cronies complaining about the deep state is
> >> >>> just fake news.    
> >> >> Those in power love seeing the sheep bleet their ignorance.
> >> >>
> >> >> The deep state is very real, and very heavily entrenched. I
> >> >> doubt Trump can clean it out, Kennedy tried and look what it
> >> >> got him. 
> >> > You really are a conspiracy theorist aren't you.    
> >> 
> >> Seriously? You think the existence of the deep state is a
> >> conspiracy theory?
> >> 
> >> Sad little sheep...  
> > 
> > The Trumpists have lately started to use the phrase to mean
> > something it hasn't before, as you have done in this thread.  It's
> > amazing how quickly and unthinkingly they've adopted it after a few
> > Trump surrogates started tossing it around.  Sad little sheep
> > indeed.  
> 
> The concept of a shadow government is all too real in many cases
> (parliamentary governments).  Do you find it difficult to believe we
> may have a facsimile here in the US of A?

A facsimile of a shadow government?

> If not,

ITYM 'if so'?  I guess it doesn't matter, as I didn't answer the first
question.

> to what end is this major thrust to tear down the president
> and his cabinet?  It appears to be going beyond simple ideology.

Major thrust?  With no idea what you're talking about, I can only say
that the unprecedented chaos within the WH is sufficient to explain the
leaking.
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general