Re: King Donald
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:35:21 -0500
- From: Caver1 <caver1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: King Donald
On 02/10/2017 09:20 AM, Disaster Master wrote:
On 2/9/2017, 4:58:04 PM, Caver1 <caver1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 02/09/2017 04:33 PM, Disaster Master wrote:
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow
that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows
no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no
acts performed under it.....
As I stated.
You stated a law was constitutional until some guy in a black robe said
The above clearly says something very different.
But6 who decides if it's unconstitutional? The guys in the
So that law/s aren't until they rule.
So... no... not 'as you stated'...
I see you cannot answer the question (not surprising).
It's amazing that you didn't even give me a chance.
You responded to the email, but ignored the question.
What email. supposedly you already gave them.
Are you a troll, or just stupid?
Evidently smarter than you.
In your response to the email I sent that contained the question, you
answered multiple points, but ignored the question.
You sent no email to me.
So, in my response to yours, I pointed this out and answered the question.
And in fact my answer was lacking in detail (I'm just engaging here off
the top of my head for the most part, obviously not good enough for a
legal brief). There are two primary jurisdictions, but 2 others that are
mixtures of the 2 primaries...
As citizens we receive our rights from the Constitution.
I see the answer to my question above is yes.
Again, The Constitution only recognizes Rights that were pre-existing,
and creates a few privileges along the way (like voting).
Voting is a government granted privilege, you know that, right?
No, but the Right to Travel is, and that Right has been adjudicated to
include the right to travel in an automobile.
Baloney. Go ahead and drive without a license and see what
happens and what the court says.
Now go ahead and ignore that one too, like you have all of the other
proofs I have submitted...
Again, The Constitution sets up the structure of our government, and
lays down some very rigid restrictions on what the government can and
Not anywhere as rigid as you would like them to be. No where
does it say that the gov't can't do anything else.
Haven't ever read the Bill of Rights have you (but I repeat myself)?
Might start with the 9th and 10th amendments.
Any law that is passed by Congress that is not in pursuance of one of
its enumerated powers is unconstitutional - or only applicable in
Try that argument in a court of law.
The list of powers for the legislature includes making laws.
Then if there is a complaint leading to a court case the
court decides if it is constitutional or not.
Same link as above, a little light reading...
general mailing list