Re: King Donald
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 15:18:02 -0500
- From: Caver1 <caver1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: King Donald
On 02/09/2017 02:59 PM, Caver1 wrote:
On 02/09/2017 02:51 PM, Disaster Master wrote:
On 2/9/2017, 2:41:20 PM, Caver1 <caver1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The are many laws which there actions are not mentioned in
the Constitution that are not unconstitutional.
Yes, and opinions are like... now how did that saying go?
Any law passed by Congress that is not pursuant to one of its few
enumerated powers is, by definition, unconstitutional.
Congress is given the power to make laws. If those laws
don't go against the Constitution then they pass muster.
Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that the only laws
that the congress can pass are ones that are mentioned in
If a law goes against the Constitution then they can be
ruled by the courts that they are unconstitutional., so it
won't survive. No other entity has that power under the
That said, Congress does legislate over two very different jurisdictions.
Can you name these two different jurisdictions?
Being so federal taxes being unconstitutional is an opinion
not a fact.
No, actually, in this case, it is a fact.
A bit difficult to prove in a casual email discussion list though, so
I'm not going to bother trying.
I forgot the Constitution does not say that the gov't can't
general mailing list