Web lists-archives.com

Re: [Mingw-users] _XOPEN_SOURCE




On 4/20/2017 11:32 AM, Bryan Henderson wrote:
> Keith Marshall, in a recent thread:
> 
>>  in _every_ case, the application is _required_ to specify the 
>>  _XOPEN_SOURCE value for which conformance is desired.
> 
> Why do you say that?  Common sense, or did you see it written somewhere?
> 
> And what do you make of the fact that every other X/Open-capable C library
> explicitly recognizes _XOPEN_SOURCE = null string as meaning "source code
> expects C library to conform to the original X/Open standard?
> 

This reference [1] supports Bryan's assertion.

[1] http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/feature_test_macros.7.html

-- 
Earnie

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
MinGW-users mailing list
MinGW-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

This list observes the Etiquette found at 
http://www.mingw.org/Mailing_Lists.
We ask that you be polite and do the same.  Disregard for the list etiquette may cause your account to be moderated.

_______________________________________________
You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users
Also: mailto:mingw-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe