Web lists-archives.com

Re: [Mingw-users] _XOPEN_SOURCE

On 4/20/2017 11:32 AM, Bryan Henderson wrote:
> Keith Marshall, in a recent thread:
>>  in _every_ case, the application is _required_ to specify the 
>>  _XOPEN_SOURCE value for which conformance is desired.
> Why do you say that?  Common sense, or did you see it written somewhere?
> And what do you make of the fact that every other X/Open-capable C library
> explicitly recognizes _XOPEN_SOURCE = null string as meaning "source code
> expects C library to conform to the original X/Open standard?

This reference [1] supports Bryan's assertion.

[1] http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/feature_test_macros.7.html


Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
MinGW-users mailing list

This list observes the Etiquette found at 
We ask that you be polite and do the same.  Disregard for the list etiquette may cause your account to be moderated.

You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at:
Also: mailto:mingw-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe