Re: [Mingw-users] msvcrt printf bug
Hi again, KHMan,
>>> Totally worries me that some embedded and aerospace folks have
>>> this kind of viewpoint. Often engineering folks are left to take
>>> up programming on their own devices and sometimes they end up
>>> grasping stuff in idiosyncratic ways. They can be very stubbornly
>>> sure of their views...
>> Well, that's a very "interesting" viewpoint... can you explain in what
>> way "embedded and aerospace folks" would make worse programmers than
>> yourself? What kind of "folks" are YOU?!
> Terribly sorry that you perceived it that way. It was not meant as
> a bad thing, it's just the way things are. "Idiosyncratic" does
> not imply "worse", just "different".
Nice try... but I will accept it, for the sake of the argument - just
please, try to be HUMBLE in what you write: not all people are
necessarily idiots (even though many actually are, indeed).
>> I HATE bragging, I really do (I think others should evaluate your
>> worth), but you forced me to it: I actually happen to have a PhD in
>> computer science, besides also having an engineering degree - do you? If
>> you need, google me (there is definitely just one Emanuel Falkenauer on
>> the whole web) - and don't skip Google Scholar.
>> Phew... you're frankly tiring with your supposed "grandiosity".
> I made an observation based on this thread only, I have no
> interest in checking out folks before talking to them on public
> mailing lists and adjusting myself based on their qualifications.
> Well, it would appear that being frank is an unloved habit on the
No, it certainly is NOT - but taking anybody else for fools just because
they disagree with you IS. I have been totally frank in my posts as well
- but I didn't consider you or anybody else automatically as being poor
idiots just because they disagreed with me - all of them could have a
> You grabbed Alexandru's code very quickly, praised it,
> plugged it into I guess company code, then he reported a bug in
> it, now would you trust that code as high-quality mature code? ...
> this, over a number of far better choices.
Granted: there could indeed be better choices - but with none of them
readily available at this very moment (remember: I'm keen to have a look
at Keith's (s)printf, to see how easy it would be to compile in
Borland), Alexandru's code solved a BIG part of our troubles. Sure, it
may not be perfect... but what is, really (the current printfs certainly
aren't!)? Alexandru's procedure made me go from a million clicks of
"Yeah, I know: that's a BOGUS discrepancy!" to NONE so far - that's a
big progress IMHO!
Remember: I may have a PhD, but I'm still an engineer in my soul - which
loosely means that I'm quite ready to adopt a solution that may sure be
imperfect in some "esoteric" way but that DELIVERS ENOUGH for what I
need to accomplish. And Alexandru's code did just that.
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
MinGW-users mailing list
This list observes the Etiquette found at
We ask that you be polite and do the same. Disregard for the list etiquette may cause your account to be moderated.
You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: