Web lists-archives.com

Re: [Mingw-users] Problems compiling Gnulib-assisted projects with MinGW runtime 3.22.2

> From: Keith Marshall <keithmarshall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 22:42:52 +0100
> On 12/10/16 15:34, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > I still think it would be good to consider relaxing our standard 
> > compliance in this one case, even though we are right and glibc is
> >  wrong.
> I'm not ruling that out, but having made the point that glibc isn't
> standards compliant, and that projects which gratuitously depend on its
> non-compliances are buggy, I would like to do it in a way which makes it
> possible to preserve our compliance, while relaxing it by default.  I
> think the attached (untested) patch may achieve that, in this case.

Thanks.  I think this would be indeed better.  However, note that
glibc doesn't exclude these prototypes from string.h when
_POSIX_SOURCE is defined.  Although AFAIK _POSIX_SOURCE defined means
the user used the -posix switch to GCC, so perhaps this is good enough
in practice.

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
MinGW-users mailing list

This list observes the Etiquette found at 
We ask that you be polite and do the same.  Disregard for the list etiquette may cause your account to be moderated.

You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at:
Also: mailto:mingw-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe