Web lists-archives.com

Re: [Mingw-users] GCC 4.9.3 "experimental"?

On 14/12/15 17:27, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Can someone please tell what prevents GCC-4.9.3-preview build to
> become the official latest build of MinGW GCC?

I cross-compiled both that, and the earlier GCC-4.8.5-preview, as
crossed-native packages, on my Linux-Mint Debian host. I posted them,
and invited comment from the community, regarding their suitability for
formal release; to date, I've had absolutely no feedback whatsoever in
this regard, (beyond this enquiry itself).

> Is something missing from the tarballs I see on the download site?

IIRC, they are lacking OpenMP support entirely, and I had difficulty in
building with Ada support, (although I was able to eventually attain the
latter, but, since my knowledge of Ada is completely non-existent, I
would have no idea where to begin testing it).

> Are the binaries somehow less safe than the latest "official" ones?

I don't know.  The GCC-4.9.3 cross-compiler I used to build them works
absolutely fine for me, in production.  However, I no longer have any
use for Windows, in any shape or form as a production platform, so until
the community offer some feedback, they will remain untested.


Public key available from keys.gnupg.net
Key fingerprint: C19E C018 1547 DE50 E1D4 8F53 C0AD 36C6 347E 5A3F

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

MinGW-users mailing list

This list observes the Etiquette found at 
We ask that you be polite and do the same.  Disregard for the list etiquette may cause your account to be moderated.

You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at:
Also: mailto:mingw-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe