Web lists-archives.com

Re: [Mingw-users] mingw error: redefinition of 'struct timespec'

On 11/10/15 18:14, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Keith Marshall <keithmarshall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 17:56:36 +0100
>> On 11/10/15 16:11, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> My personal solution is (assuming you don't really need pthreads in
>>> that project) to rename the pthreads headers, so they "don't exist" as
>>> far as the configuration scripts are concerned.
>> A reasonable approach, but kind of begs the question ... if the project
>> doesn't need pthreads, why would its configuration script(s) check for
>> <pthread.h>?
> Because the standard GNU configure tests "know" this is one place
> where 'struct timespec' is declared.

Ah.  Okay, thanks for that clarification, but (being pedantic) should it
not rather look to <sched.h>, since that is where POSIX.1 requires
struct timespec to be defined?  (Of course, that definition would then
propagate through <pthread.h>, which is required to expose all of the
definitions within <sched.h> anyway, but selecting the outer header is
nothing short of blatant namespace pollution, especially since the
preferred origin for struct timespec is <time.h> in the first place).

>> (Unless, of course, it can use pthreads if supported, or some
>> alternative fall-back otherwise ... in which case lack of any such
>> alternative support could be something of a show-stopper).
> No, most such packages don't use pthreads (or any threads), they just
> need the struct declaration.

In which case, they should favour <time.h> as its provider ... yes, I do
know that mingwrt-3.21 was broken in this respect, but that has been
corrected in mingwrt-3.21.1.  Any preference to elect for inclusion of
<pthread.h>, rather than <time.h>, if that's what it actually does just
for struct timespec, seems to me like it may be a misfeature of GNU


Public key available from keys.gnupg.net
Key fingerprint: C19E C018 1547 DE50 E1D4 8F53 C0AD 36C6 347E 5A3F

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

MinGW-users mailing list

This list observes the Etiquette found at 
We ask that you be polite and do the same.  Disregard for the list etiquette may cause your account to be moderated.

You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at:
Also: mailto:mingw-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe