Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH v5.1-rc] iwlwifi: make locking in iwl_mvm_tx_mpdu() BH-safe

On Mon, 15 Apr 2019, Johannes Berg wrote:

> > If there are other reasons why disable BH for the whole function (are 
> > there?), then this bigger hammer works as well of course.
> I thought there are, but seeing the commit log here I'm not sure.
> In any case, even if not, the function itself is part of the TX fast
> path, but the caller from the workqueue is very uncommon (basically only
> happens for a handful of packets on each new RA/TID), so I'd say that'd
> be a good reason to use the slightly bigger hammer (it's not that much
> different really, if you look at how much code is covered by the lock)
> and avoid doing it all the time when we know it to be not needed.

Given that we don't have a primitive in lockdep to assert this invariant, 
would you consider queuing the below on top of f5ae2f932e2f in 


From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] iwlwifi: iwl_mvm_tx_mpdu() must be called with BH disabled

As iwl_mvm_tx_mpdu() is not disabling BH while obtaining iwl_mvm_sta->lock 
(which is being taken from BH context as well), it has to be always 
invoked with BH disabled. Make that clear in a comment.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c
index 0c2aabc842f9..ad4760307726 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c
@@ -1063,7 +1063,9 @@ static int iwl_mvm_tx_pkt_queued(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
- * Sets the fields in the Tx cmd that are crypto related
+ * Sets the fields in the Tx cmd that are crypto related.
+ *
+ * This function must be called with BHs disabled.
 static int iwl_mvm_tx_mpdu(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct sk_buff *skb,
 			   struct ieee80211_tx_info *info,

Jiri Kosina