Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] Revert "scsi: ufs: disable vccq if it's not needed by UFS device"
- Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2019 10:54:09 +0100
- From: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] Revert "scsi: ufs: disable vccq if it's not needed by UFS device"
On 09/02/2019 10:07, Avri Altman wrote:
> On 08/02/2019 23:20, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>> This reverts commit 60f0187031c05e04cbadffb62f557d0ff3564490.
>> Calling ufshcd_set_vccq_rail_unused() breaks UFS init on two boards.
>> I would say that vccq is *not* not needed.
>> Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@xxxxxxx>
> Those tags got switched off.
What do you mean?
> I still think that If you are reverting the quirk implementation,
> you should remove the quirk listing as well.
You're right, of course. I just thought it could wait until
after this series was accepted, but I can fold it in v5, as
a follow-up patch.
> Also, as the v3 discussion held on several threads,
> and new people might be joining in,
> maybe you could reply to this patch with a couple of sentences summing-up
> the various theories that this bring-up raised.
Will do in v5, either in the commit message, or in the
sub-text that is not committed.