[PATCH] docs/completion.txt: Fix a couple of punctuation nits
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 22:56:32 +0800
- From: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [PATCH] docs/completion.txt: Fix a couple of punctuation nits
This patch fixes a couple of punctuation nits which can make the document
more correct and readable.
Also missing "()" are added to some function references for consistency.
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/completion.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/completion.txt
index 656cf80..108bd0f 100644
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ A typical usage scenario is:
This is not implying any temporal order on wait_for_completion() and the
call to complete() - if the call to complete() happened before the call
to wait_for_completion() then the waiting side simply will continue
-immediately as all dependencies are satisfied if not it will block until
+immediately as all dependencies are satisfied; if not, it will block until
completion is signaled by complete().
Note that wait_for_completion() is calling spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq(),
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ wait_for_completion():
The default behavior is to wait without a timeout and to mark the task as
uninterruptible. wait_for_completion() and its variants are only safe
in process context (as they can sleep) but not in atomic context,
-interrupt context, with disabled irqs. or preemption is disabled - see also
+interrupt context, with disabled irqs, or preemption is disabled - see also
try_wait_for_completion() below for handling completion in atomic/interrupt
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ queue spinlock. Any such concurrent calls to complete() or complete_all()
probably are a design bug.
Signaling completion from hard-irq context is fine as it will appropriately
-lock with spin_lock_irqsave/spin_unlock_irqrestore and it will never sleep.
+lock with spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_unlock_irqrestore() and it will never sleep.