Web lists-archives.com

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][V3] drm/i915/guc: fix GEM_BUG_ON check




On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:38:04 +0200, Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The check for level being less than zero always false because flags
is currently unsigned and can never be negative. Fix this by making
level a s32.

Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1468363 ("Macro compares unsigned to 0")

Fixes: cb5d64e9f13e ("drm/i915/guc: Allow user to control default GuC logging")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
V3: Make level s32 and add the missing Fixes: tag, thanks to Dan Carpenter and
Jani Nikula for correcting my mistakes

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
index 116f4ccf1bbd..bdb1fab322bf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ void intel_guc_fini(struct intel_guc *guc)
static u32 get_log_control_flags(void)
 {
-	u32 level = i915_modparams.guc_log_level;
+	s32 level = i915_modparams.guc_log_level;

s/s32 level/int level

to match modparam type as already suggested by others

 	u32 flags = 0;
	GEM_BUG_ON(level < 0);

please note that this BUG_ON will go away with pending [1] so maybe
we can just merge series [2] instead ?

Thanks,
Michal

[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/227365/
[2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/44201/