Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] gpio: pca953x: define masks for addressing common and extended registers
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 21:57:36 +0200
- From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] gpio: pca953x: define masks for addressing common and extended registers
> Am 16.05.2018 um 21:50 schrieb Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 8:01 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> These mask bits are to be used to map the extended register
>> addreseses (which are defined for an unsupported 8-bit pcal chip)
>> to 16 and 24 bit chips (pcal6524).
>> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
>> index 2b667166e855..c0eb679e60d4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
>> @@ -56,6 +56,10 @@
>> #define PCAL6524_DEBOUNCE 0x2d
>> #define PCA_GPIO_MASK 0x00FF
>> +#define PCAL_GPIO_MASK GENMASK(4, 0)
>> +#define PCAL_PINCTRL_MASK (~PCAL_GPIO_MASK)
> I give second thought about it, and think
> either plain values, or second converted to its own explicit GENMASK
> would be better.
> (most confusing part to me is unknowness of the side of PINCTRL part
> in the mask)
Then, I'd also prefer plain values.
If ok, I can send a v7 tomorrow.