Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] gpio: pca953x: define masks for addressing common and extended registers




> Am 16.05.2018 um 21:50 schrieb Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 8:01 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> These mask bits are to be used to map the extended register
>> addreseses (which are defined for an unsupported 8-bit pcal chip)
>> to 16 and 24 bit chips (pcal6524).
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
>> index 2b667166e855..c0eb679e60d4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
>> @@ -56,6 +56,10 @@
>> #define PCAL6524_DEBOUNCE      0x2d
>> 
>> #define PCA_GPIO_MASK          0x00FF
>> +
>> +#define PCAL_GPIO_MASK         GENMASK(4, 0)
>> +#define PCAL_PINCTRL_MASK      (~PCAL_GPIO_MASK)
>> +
> 
> I give second thought about it, and think
> either plain values, or second converted to its own explicit GENMASK
> would be better.
> 
> (most confusing part to me is unknowness of the side of PINCTRL part
> in the mask)

I see.

Then, I'd also prefer plain values.

If ok, I can send a v7 tomorrow.

BR,
Nikolaus