# Re: [PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit

*Date*: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 21:26:30 +0200*From*: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>*Subject*: Re: [PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It seems to me that it makes no sense for threshold_ns to be of type u64, > because the expression threshold_us * 1000 will never exceed the 32-bit > limits. So if you agree I can send a patch to change its type to u32 > instead. Whatever Bjorn prefers. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

**References**:**[PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit***From:*Gustavo A. R. Silva

**Re: [PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit***From:*Andy Shevchenko

**Re: [PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit***From:*Gustavo A. R. Silva

- Prev by Date:
**[PATCH v4] extcon: int3496: process id-pin first so that we start with the right status** - Next by Date:
**Re: [PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit** - Next by thread:
**Re: [PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit** - Index(es):