# Re: PM regression in next

*Date*: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 14:55:26 +0100*From*: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>*Subject*: Re: PM regression in next

> Thanks that fixes the suspend error. And I was able to confirm > that the suspend power consumption is OK. > > That still leaves the mystery of the runtime idle power consumption > being much higher with commit e130bc1d00a4. Did you re-measure the runtime power? Do you have an unused PHY? It could be it is not getting shut down. 1G PHYs can be quite power hungry. Andrew

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: PM regression in next***From:*Tony Lindgren

**References**:**PM regression in next***From:*Tony Lindgren

**Re: PM regression in next***From:*Tony Lindgren

**Re: PM regression in next***From:*Rafael J. Wysocki

**Re: PM regression in next***From:*Rafael J. Wysocki

**Re: PM regression in next***From:*Lars-Peter Clausen

**Re: PM regression in next***From:*Andrew Lunn

**Re: PM regression in next***From:*Tony Lindgren

- Prev by Date:
**Re: PM regression in next** - Next by Date:
**[GIT PULL] x86 fixes** - Previous by thread:
**Re: PM regression in next** - Next by thread:
**Re: PM regression in next** - Index(es):