Web lists-archives.com

[PATCH 5/9] perf ui progress: Make sure we always define step value




From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>

Unlikely, but we could have ui_progress__init being called with total <
16, which would set the next and step variables to 0. That would force
unnecessary ui_progress__ops->update calls because 'next' would never
raise.

Forcing the next and step values to be always > 0.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170908120510.22515-2-jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/perf/ui/progress.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/progress.c b/tools/perf/ui/progress.c
index a0f24c7115c5..a9c15804b1f6 100644
--- a/tools/perf/ui/progress.c
+++ b/tools/perf/ui/progress.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ void ui_progress__update(struct ui_progress *p, u64 adv)
 void ui_progress__init(struct ui_progress *p, u64 total, const char *title)
 {
 	p->curr = 0;
-	p->next = p->step = total / 16;
+	p->next = p->step = total / 16 ?: 1;
 	p->total = total;
 	p->title = title;
 
-- 
2.13.5