Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] reset: socfpga: use the reset-simple driver




Hi Phillip,

On 08/11/2017 06:06 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
[snip]

@@ -113,8 +137,33 @@ static int reset_simple_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	data->rcdev.ops = &reset_simple_ops;
 	data->rcdev.of_node = dev->of_node;

-	if (devdata)
+	if (devdata == &reset_simple_socfpga) {

This sort of special-case handling opens the gate to adding special-case handling for any new device, which somewhat defeats the purpose of a generic driver.

+		u32 modrst_offset;
+
+		/*
+		 * The binding was mainlined without the required property.
+		 * Do not continue, when we encounter an old DT.
+		 */
+		if (!of_find_property(dev->of_node, "#reset-cells", NULL)) {
+			dev_err(dev, "%pOF missing #reset-cells property\n",
+				dev->of_node);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}

Is the check still required in this context, since (devm_)reset_control_get() complains really loudly if #reset-cells is missing?

+
+		if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "altr,modrst-offset",
+					 &modrst_offset)) {
+			dev_warn(dev, "missing altr,modrst-offset property, assuming 0x10!\n");
+			modrst_offset = 0x10;
+		}

This can be a generic "reg-offset" property. If and until the devicetrees are updated, "altr,modrst-offset" would also have to be read as an alternative. Since a platform data already exists, reset_simple_devdata could be a better place to store the default offset of 0x10 for socfpga.

Alex