Web lists-archives.com

Re: attempting to format brd device results in OOM kills

On 06/18/2017 04:21 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 06/18/2017 10:30 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
>> I've run across a regression from v4.11. If I boot a v4.12-rc1 or later
>> kernel, make a large brd device and try to format it, it quickly slows
>> down to a crawl and then the OOM killer kicks in.
>> I ran a bisect and it landed here:
>> commit f09a06a193d942a12c1a33c153388b3962222006 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)
>> Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
>> Date:   Wed Apr 5 19:21:16 2017 +0200
>>     brd: remove discard support
>>     It's just a in-driver reimplementation of writing zeroes to the pages,
>>     which fails if the discards aren't page aligned.
>>     Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
>>     Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
>>     Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx>
>> I've been reproducing it in a VM with ~8G allocated to it:
>> I have a modprobe.d file with this in it:
>>     options brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=1073741824
>> I then just:
>>     # modprobe brd
>>     # mkfs -t ext2 /dev/ram0
>> It keels over pretty quickly after that.
> Just checked, and creating a 1TB ram disk and then running mkfs.ext2 on it
> writes 16851MiB of data. I can't say I'm surprised you OOM, if you run that
> in a 8G VM, as you're about 8G short.
> I'm puzzled as to why the discard change would make any difference, however.

Reverted the patch, and I see identical behavior. The only difference is that
the whole device is trimmed first, as expected. But it still writes ~16G

Are you sure this commit is what broke things for you? Honestly, I don't see
how it could ever work with 1TB ram disk, 8G of RAM, and 16G of data written.

Jens Axboe