Web lists-archives.com

[PATCH 4.4 29/45] ext4: fix inode checksum calculation problem if i_extra_size is small




4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@xxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 05ac5aa18abd7db341e54df4ae2b4c98ea0e43b7 upstream.

We've fixed the race condition problem in calculating ext4 checksum
value in commit b47820edd163 ("ext4: avoid modifying checksum fields
directly during checksum veficationon"). However, by this change,
when calculating the checksum value of inode whose i_extra_size is
less than 4, we couldn't calculate the checksum value in a proper way.
This problem was found and reported by Nix, Thank you.

Reported-by: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Youngjin Gil <youngjin.gil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 fs/ext4/inode.c |    5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -71,10 +71,9 @@ static __u32 ext4_inode_csum(struct inod
 			csum = ext4_chksum(sbi, csum, (__u8 *)&dummy_csum,
 					   csum_size);
 			offset += csum_size;
-			csum = ext4_chksum(sbi, csum, (__u8 *)raw + offset,
-					   EXT4_INODE_SIZE(inode->i_sb) -
-					   offset);
 		}
+		csum = ext4_chksum(sbi, csum, (__u8 *)raw + offset,
+				   EXT4_INODE_SIZE(inode->i_sb) - offset);
 	}
 
 	return csum;