Re: on linux virtual memory manager (was: Re: disable akonadi)
- Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 22:33:20 +0200
- From: René J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: on linux virtual memory manager (was: Re: disable akonadi)
On Monday September 03 2018 20:16:17 Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> How would it know which application this would be when mutiple processes
> allocate a chunk of memory each? If you have a bank and all people want
> their money back at the same time, how would you decide who will not get
> their money back?
First come, first served basis, and something similar for big requests, with some kind of floating threshold of what's still acceptable as a function of memory stress?
> The first time I learned about this behavior of the Linux kernel I
> thought: WTF? AFAIR the Solaris kernel does not do that. I am not sure
> what BSD kernels like the one of FreeBSD or DragonFly BSD do.
AFAIK the Linux kernel is the only one that has overcommit (at least such an extreme version).
> 2) Increase /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_ratio to maybe about 80 or 90 so
> that the kernel allows to allocate 80 or 90% of the physical memory even
> with overcommitting disabled completely.
I used to do
echo 80 > /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_ratio
echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory
> Enough of that. Just in case you like to get rid of baloo file indexer
> you may like to enable strict overcommit. :)
I think there are easier ways to do that, like turning desktop search off in system-settings ;)