Re: KMail dependence on Akonadi
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 03:26:08 +0300
- From: Aleksey Midenkov <midenok@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: KMail dependence on Akonadi
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Kevin Krammer <krammer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Saturday, 2017-07-08, 11:58:02, Aleksey Midenkov wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Kevin Krammer <krammer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Saturday, 2017-07-08, 02:37:22, Aleksey Midenkov wrote:
>> Why you invented some
>> service if there are commonly used SQL servers?
> Not sure what you mean, the Akonadi services is using standard databases for
> its data management needs: MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite are options as far as I
Then why there is additional proxy process (Akonadi) between KMail and
DBMS? What special functions this Akonadi service does that require it
to be additional process? Why can't it be just shared library that
will adapt this PIM API (so called Akonadi) to DBMS services? In other
words: put Akonadi as shared library inside KMail, Calendar, etc.
instead of separate process.
> Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
> KDE user support, developer mentoring