Re: Gitlab Evaluation & Migration
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 22:47:03 +1300
- From: Ben Cooksley <bcooksley@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Gitlab Evaluation & Migration
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 5:18 AM Harald Sitter <sitter@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 2:38 PM Boudewijn Rempt <boud@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On zaterdag 23 februari 2019 12:08:05 CET Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > * Is there anything we can have that can replace tasks and workboards? We usually have some very long-running tasks that get a lot of sub-tasks and that basically document our development process. One thing I've learned with Phabricator is that project planning and issue tracking have nothing to do with each other.
> > Another thing here: what would be a good way to keep the really valuable information we've put in our tasks available? We have been tracking some big projects in phab's task system, and that information would be really hard to lose, but it would also rather suck to have to convert that manually to wiki pages or whatever...
> I suppose I could be persuaded to migrate all tasks again ;)
> As Eike mentioned the current boards feature is fairly limited though,
> so that may complicate things (a lot).
Fortunately we've already been linked to work done by others (FD.o,
GNOME, etc), so hopefully it'll just be a case of testing it on our
data, fixing any minor things we come across, then performing the
actual live migration :)
I haven't looked too much into that though as I wanted confirmation we
were going to undertake a migration before focusing on getting this