Web lists-archives.com

Re: Gitlab Evaluation & Migration




On maandag 25 februari 2019 09:12:47 CET Eike Hein wrote:
> 
> I'm aware of several projects who would like to incubate with KDE.org 
> (e.g. Kaidan and Spectral, both new-breed Kirigami apps with new 
> contributor ecosystems) but are waiting for the outcome of this 
> decision, because they believe being part of KDE wouldn't be worth the 
> cost of losing access to contributors that Phabricator imposes to them.

I've my doubts about that. I haven't had any problems whatsoever attracting new developers to Krita because of phabricator.

> It's also worth noting that we're the only big FOSS player using 
> Phabricator at the moment.

Blender uses phabricator, and Blender is a huge FOSS player. 

Mind, I'm not arguing against moving to gitlab, I guess it's the right thing to do, because Phabricator's lack of maintenance mainly, but let's keep the record straight. 


-- 
https://www.krita.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.