Re: Gitlab Evaluation & Migration
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:23:26 +0100
- From: Boudewijn Rempt <boud@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Gitlab Evaluation & Migration
On maandag 25 februari 2019 09:12:47 CET Eike Hein wrote: > > I'm aware of several projects who would like to incubate with KDE.org > (e.g. Kaidan and Spectral, both new-breed Kirigami apps with new > contributor ecosystems) but are waiting for the outcome of this > decision, because they believe being part of KDE wouldn't be worth the > cost of losing access to contributors that Phabricator imposes to them. I've my doubts about that. I haven't had any problems whatsoever attracting new developers to Krita because of phabricator. > It's also worth noting that we're the only big FOSS player using > Phabricator at the moment. Blender uses phabricator, and Blender is a huge FOSS player. Mind, I'm not arguing against moving to gitlab, I guess it's the right thing to do, because Phabricator's lack of maintenance mainly, but let's keep the record straight. -- https://www.krita.org
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.