Web lists-archives.com

Re: Gitlab Evaluation & Migration





В Сб, 23 фев. 2019 в 2:08 ПП (PM), Boudewijn Rempt <boud@xxxxxxxxxxx> написал:
On zaterdag 23 februari 2019 10:44:11 CET Ben Cooksley wrote:

 https://notes.kde.org/p/gitlab-evaluation-notes

A few notes on my side:

* Krita has been using the mockup functionality extensively. We would miss that functionality, as we actually do UX design for our new features.

* It's ages since I used gitlab myself (2015, I think), but I've always found the ease with which a patch can be submitted for a repo a good thing in phabricator.

As someone who uses gitlab on a dayjob I can tell it's pretty easy too. With disregard to server interface you do `git push my-fork HEAD`, right? Now, when you push to gitlab server, you get in the git output a link that refers to creating a merge request to upstream. You just click it, and then in a browser press "Ok".

* Is there anything we can have that can replace tasks and workboards? We usually have some very long-running tasks that get a lot of sub-tasks and that basically document our development process. One thing I've learned with Phabricator is that project planning and issue tracking have nothing to do with each other.

--
https://www.krita.org