Web lists-archives.com

Re: Transitioning CI builds of all non-Frameworks from Qt 5.9




El dimecres, 5 de desembre de 2018, a les 19:38:12 CET, Allan Sandfeld Jensen va escriure:
> On Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2018 18:10:44 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Monday, 3 December 2018 01:30:25 PST René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> > > Can't you just configure the CI to use Qt 5.10? I think it's not good to
> > > hardcode an "overzealous" (for lack of a better word) Qt version in
> > > projects that don't require them AND I think that one should support the
> > > current LTS release in as many projects as possible as a general rule of
> > > principle.
> > > 
> > > There's a reason why those LTS releases exist and that should probably be
> > > taken into consideration ESPECIALLY for the KF5 Frameworks (remember why
> > > kdelibs4 was split up)!
> > 
> > Which is exactly why 5.11.3 (released today) should be picked. It contains
> > all fixes that 5.9.7 contains, whereas 5.10.1 does not. Moving from 5.9.7
> > to 5.10.1 means regressing all those fixes.
> 
> Yeah, the only sensible option is to support the last LTS release and the 
> latest non-LTS release. Moving from 5.9 to 5.10 is backwards, and kdepim 
> moving to an insecure unsupported Qt version should not be encouraged.

Nobody is moving to an insecure unsupported Qt version.

Albert

> 
> 'Allan
> 
>