Re: Babe project - Legal feedback
- Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 23:20:10 +0100
- From: Lydia Pintscher <lydia@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Babe project - Legal feedback
On Feb 3, 2018 21:19, "Camilo Higuita Rodriguez" <chiguitar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My case is the following, let's say that there's a feature for streaming audio, and the users stream the song they are listening to, what would go down in that case? Who's in legal troubles?Also if I were to send an mp3 over email to a few friends, where's the illegal stand point there? The platform has some fault for allowing to "distribute" the file? Or the user who emailed the content?And yes, so far the platform only shares the playlist info, and if there are matches with your collection then you can listen to it.But it would be really cool to be able to somehow share your music... tipping around those copyright issues. What if the case is that the user has some kind of music cloud and gives access to that cloud to another user, still illegal?Lol as I see this it seems like the answer is : "don't you mess with music copyrights, whatever you do will get you in trouble somehow"Does anybody know of any KDE community member who is could ask these legal questions?
Please get in touch with the KDE e.V. board about this if there is a chance this could get us into legal trouble. We already suggested a call to discuss the details.
On Feb 3, 2018 3:07 PM, "Albert Astals Cid" <aacid@xxxxxxx> wrote:El dissabte, 3 de febrer de 2018, a les 18:07:27 CET, Camilo Higuita Rodriguez
> I'd like to discuss something with the community, and maybe get some legal
> As some of you might already know I'm working on a open online platform to
> share music information between users, such as public playlists, comments
> on tracks and on the playback progress like soundcloud, share popular music
> suggestions, metadata, and discovery of new music from another users with
> integration with YouTube and Spotify etc... the platform will be integrated
> into Babe music player and could be use in any other music player
> The legal matter comes here:
> 1- I would like to either have the option to *stream live* the music an
> user is currently listening to to a group of friends. here the music file
> isn't being storaged in the audience computer...
> How ilegal is it? How illegal is to stream live, but privately, copyrighted
> music? and how illegal is it to stream owns music content to a selected
> group of friends?
> 2- If the stream part wouldn't be enought problem, I'd also like to sync a
> user playlist marked as public to some other friends, that would mean to
> share music files between users, and technically downloading another users
> music files. How illegal is this part? how illegal is to share a music file
> for example, in a conversation in telegram or whatsapp, or even how illegal
> is it to send a mp3 to a friend over an email or even over google drive?
> I'd like to get feedback about this issues.
> As the project is going to be hosted by the KDE community this streaming
> part won't be implemented to avoid legal issues, but however I would like
> to have this discussion to get as many feedback as possible.
I am not sure you're approaching this the right way.
For me it doesn't really matter if users can do illegal stuff with our
software, what matters is that the software is legal and that it has legal
uses (see KTorrent).
What I think you should be asking yourself is "will I/KDE be in problems for
shipping this sofware?" more than "can my user pontentially get in trouble for
using my sofware to do illegal stuff?".
> Thank you.