Re: Bugzilla maintenance work
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:34:05 -0600
- From: Nate Graham <pointedstick@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Bugzilla maintenance work
On 06/16/2017 02:38 PM, Christoph Feck wrote:
On 16.06.2017 22:28, Nate Graham wrote:
Thank you, Chris.
So I should not mark a bug as CONFIRMED when I or someone else has
simply reproduced it? The most logical meaning to me is that CONFIRMED
means "We've verified that this is a real bug but we don't yet know
what's causing it".
If you can reproduce it, you can add the 'reproducible' keyword, or add
a comment, especially if you feel the steps to reproduce are not
described in detail.
For example, I tried to reproduce bug 381265 but could not, either
because I have a different configuration of KRunner plugins or different
Plasma version, or the steps are explained in a way that I did something
I would rather set the state to NEEDSINFO, especially because it lacks a
FWIW, I can reproduce it 100% with the following exact sequence of
No backtrace is generated, though, either on the console or via drkonqi.
What could be up with that?