Web lists-archives.com

Re: We need to enable auto close in github pull requests

On 29.03.2017 09:59, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:21 AM, A. Bikadorov
> <alex.bikadorov@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 25.03.2017 18:06, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>>> El dissabte, 25 de març de 2017, a les 17:15:29 CET, Ralf Habacker va
>>> escriure:
>>>> Am 22.03.2017 um 07:55 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
>>>>> Em segunda-feira, 13 de mar�o de 2017, �s 01:53:05 PDT, Ralf Habacker
>>>>> escreveu:
>>>>>> Am 13.03.2017 um 00:31 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
>>>>>>> Looking at https://github.com/pulls?q=is%3Apr+org%3Akde+is%3Aopen makes
>>>>>>> me
>>>>>>> very sad seeing how there's people that want to contribute but will
>>>>>>> never
>>>>>>> get an answer.
>>>>>>> Even if you click to those 109 closed you can see how there are some
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> are from people that clearly got fed up from waiting.
>>>>>>> Please people that administer the github account (�Riddell?) make that
>>>>>>> happen
>>>>>> It may be unrelated but; At least for the github KDE/umbrello repo there
>>>>>> is the following message displayed:  Only those with write access to
>>>>>> this repository can merge pull requests.
>>>>>> Looking at the related pull requests for umbrello they looks reasonable.
>>>>>> Who is able to merge them ?
>>>>> That's the ntire point: *no* one is able to merge GitHub Pull Requests in
>>>>> most of the repositories. That's by policy, since the submission should
>>>>> go through Phabricator instead.
>>>> Unfortunally people did not may be noticed about that policy on creating
>>>> the pull request. Not better to use the github pull request template
>>>> (see https://github.com/blog/2111-issue-and-pull-request-templates ) to
>>>> inform them before creating an autoclosed request ?
>>> Obviously when i mean autoclosing i mean  close it and point them to the right
>>> place, not just close it.
>>> Cheers,
>>>   Albert
>> If there is both, a README and README.md file in the repo, the README.md is preferred for
>> the "about" text of the project shown on Github. Which means we could add a README.md with
>> some standard text to every repo only for Github.
>> The advantage is that contributors will (most likely) see this before they create the pull
>> request. (Or as an addition to a PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE file and/or autoclose script).
> Phabricator also displays .md files I believe, so this would cause
> those standard texts to be shown there.

Not if there is also a README file. See
https://phabricator.kde.org/source/krusader/ and