Web lists-archives.com

Re: kdereview

Ben Cooksley ha scritto:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> El divendres, 30 de setembre de 2016, a les 21:17:56 CEST, Ben Cooksley va
>> escriure:
>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> El dimecres, 21 de setembre de 2016, a les 11:01:18 CEST, Allen Winter va
>>>> escriure:
>>>>> kwave is now moved to kdemultimedia.
>>>> Why did that happen?
>>> It was moved at the request of it's maintainer and Allen.
>>>> Did i miss the emails to k-c-d about reviewing it?
>>> I've just searched my mail - you didn't miss it. When the repository
>>> was moved to KDE Review the Sysadmin ticket would have expressly
>>> requested that the review process on kde-core-devel be started by the
>>> maintainer now that we'd processed the move. It appears that didn't
>>> happen.
>>> Thoughts on what should be done in regards to KWave here?
>> Following the rules strictly I'd say to move it back to kdereview until we do
>> the usual steps, i.e. email to k-c-d and the module list and get the review.
>> Now, moving stuff around is a bit of a pain, so if Thomas can get those emails
>> sent *NOW* I guess we can do the discussion with the kwave repo still in the
>> kdemultimedia location and if nothing critical is found we save ourselves
>> moving things back and forth.
> I've not seen the email, so i've now pushed KWave back into review.

... so another round of moving translations.

I would have advocated for a slightly longer waiting time.